Park type

Finance for touring and camping parks

Touring and camping parks are seasonal trading businesses with lighter capital needs than static sites. We arrange commercial funding shaped around nightly and weekly pitch income, facility revenue and any glamping diversification.

Matt Lenzie
Written and reviewed by Matt Lenzie Founder & Principal Broker · 25 years arranging commercial property finance

Funding touring & camping parks

A touring and camping park sells nights rather than ownership. Guests arrive with their own touring caravan, motorhome, campervan or tent and pay a nightly or weekly pitch fee, often topped up with electric hook-up, facility and shop income. Compared with a static caravan park there is no holiday-home sales operation, so the income mix is simpler but also more seasonal and more weather-exposed. Many of the best-known touring sites sit in coastal areas or in or near an Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty, which supports premium pricing in season but can also bring tighter planning conditions on numbers, layout and how long the site may open each year. The capital intensity is lower than a static park, since the operator is not financing a resident fleet, but the trade still rests on a settled licence and consent.

From a funding point of view a lender still treats the park as a trading business and lends on its EBITDA, not on a residential loan-to-value basis. The headline question is the durability of seasonal income: how full the park runs in peak weeks, how long the operating season is, and how much of the revenue comes from repeat visitors and facilities rather than one good summer. Diversification is increasingly part of the story, with camping pods, glamping units, lodges and hardstanding upgrades smoothing income and lifting average pitch yields. The UK context is sizeable, with industry figures pointing to roughly 6,200 holiday parks and around 440,000 pitches across the sector (UKCCA, Pitching the Value 2024), of which touring and camping make up a substantial share. We arrange and introduce funding for these sites; we do not lend, and we do not give financial, legal or tax advice.

What we fund

  • Touring caravan and motorhome parks
  • Tent and family camping sites
  • Coastal and AONB touring parks
  • Glamping and pod sites
  • Mixed touring and seasonal-pitch parks

Indicative terms

  • Typical lot sizecirca £400,000 to £8m and above
  • Loan to valuecirca 50% to 65%
  • Termup to 20 to 25 years
  • Rateindicative, priced on EBITDA and risk

Indicative only. Terms vary by lender, asset and borrower and are not an offer of finance.

How do lenders assess a seasonal touring park?

Lenders look hardest at the shape and resilience of the trading year. A touring park concentrates income into a peak season, so an underwriter wants to see how full the site runs in those weeks, how long the permitted season is, and how much revenue comes from repeat bookings and facilities rather than a single fine summer. They normalise EBITDA from the accounts and test whether it services the debt with room to spare in a weaker year. Lower capital intensity helps, because there is no resident fleet to finance, but the same fundamentals apply: a clean licence, a workable planning consent and freehold or long-leasehold tenure support stronger terms. Loan to value typically sits around 50% to 65% of an earnings-based value. Diversification income from pods or glamping can strengthen the case. All figures are indicative and not an offer of finance.

Which lenders fund touring and camping parks?

Touring and camping parks are funded by the same broad pool of specialist leisure and commercial lenders that supports the wider park sector, but appetite within that pool varies with the seasonality of the trade. Some lenders are very comfortable with well-run seasonal businesses and will look past the natural peaks and troughs of a touring calendar, while others prefer the steadier feel of year-round or static income and price seasonality more cautiously. Sites in strong coastal or AONB locations, with a long operating season and a healthy share of repeat visitors, tend to find the warmest reception. As an arranger and introducer we know which desks treat seasonal touring income sympathetically and which do not, so we direct each file to lenders whose criteria actually fit rather than testing the market blind. We do not lend and we do not give financial, legal or tax advice; any terms are indicative and not an offer of finance.

What does the exit look like?

For a touring park the usual exit is the ongoing business itself, serviced by a long-term commercial mortgage, or an onward sale to another leisure operator who values the location, the consent and the established bookings base. Because there is no resident fleet to unwind, the business is relatively clean to transfer, and buyers pay for sustainable seasonal earnings and goodwill. Where funding has supported acquisition or a diversification project such as adding glamping, lenders look for the improved trading to evidence a refinance onto longer-term debt, or a sale that comfortably clears the facility. We set the intended exit out at the start and keep it realistic against the season and the consent. This is general information, not advice, and any figures are indicative and not an offer of finance.

Finance that suits this asset class

Fund a touring & camping parks deal

A view on fundability within one working day.

Seasonality and how lenders read it

Seasonality is the defining feature of a touring park, and it is not a weakness in a lender's eyes so long as it is understood and evidenced. The key is to show that peak-season trading is strong enough, and the operating season long enough, that the normalised annual EBITDA services the debt with comfort even in a poorer summer. A site that runs close to full in school holidays, holds a healthy shoulder season and earns steadily from facilities is a more resilient proposition than one that depends entirely on a few perfect weeks. Lenders also like to see a base of repeat visitors, because returning guests are a softer but real form of recurring income.

What undermines a touring file is volatility that cannot be explained. Wide swings in occupancy with no clear cause, or income that leans on one exceptional year, make an underwriter cautious and tend to pull the loan to value down. We help owners present several years of trading so the pattern of the business is visible, separating genuine underlying performance from weather-driven noise. Where a site has a credible plan to extend the season or smooth income, we make sure that plan is shown clearly. This is information only, not advice, and any figures are indicative and not an offer of finance.

Location, AONB and planning

Touring parks often occupy exactly the places people most want to visit, which is both a commercial strength and a planning constraint. A coastal setting or a site in or near an Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty supports premium pricing and strong demand, but it frequently comes with tighter conditions on pitch numbers, layout, screening and the length of the operating season. Those conditions feed directly into the income a lender can underwrite, because they cap how much the site can earn and for how long each year. A consent that permits a longer season or a higher pitch count is, all else equal, worth more.

We treat the planning position as a core part of the file rather than an afterthought. Understanding the permitted season length, any occupancy or numbers conditions and the tenure of the land lets a lender size the loan accurately and avoids late surprises. Where an owner is contemplating changes such as additional pitches or glamping units, those usually require their own planning route, which sits outside our role and should be taken with proper planning advice. We work from the consent as it stands. This is general information, not legal or planning advice, and any terms indicated are not an offer of finance.

Glamping and pods as diversification

Diversification has reshaped many touring parks over the last decade, and lenders increasingly expect to see it. Adding camping pods, glamping units, safari tents or lodge-style accommodation lets a park earn from guests who do not own touring kit, command higher nightly rates and, importantly, smooth income across a longer season. A well-judged glamping offer can lift the average yield per pitch noticeably and reduce a park's exposure to a single weak summer, which is precisely the resilience an underwriter is looking for. For that reason a credible diversification record, or a costed plan, can strengthen a funding case rather than complicate it.

It does need to be presented honestly. New glamping income should be evidenced by actual bookings and margins where it already exists, or by realistic, costed projections where it is planned, not by optimistic assumptions. Capital projects to install pods or upgrade hardstandings may themselves need funding, which is a different conversation from a straightforward acquisition or refinance. We help owners frame both the trading and the project so a lender sees the upside and the cost clearly. As always, this is general information rather than advice, and any figures shown are indicative and not an offer of finance.

Capital intensity and what that means for funding

One of the practical advantages of a touring park over a static site is lower capital intensity. Because guests bring their own caravans, motorhomes or tents, the operator is not financing a resident fleet of holiday homes, so there is less capital tied up in stock and fewer moving parts in the balance sheet. That can make a touring park a more accessible entry point for buyers and can keep the funding structure simpler, with the loan supporting the land, infrastructure and goodwill rather than a depreciating fleet.

The flip side is that, without a sales-margin engine, the income leans more heavily on pitch fees and facilities, which raises the importance of occupancy and season length in the lender's analysis. Investment then tends to flow into things that lift those numbers: better facilities, hardstandings, electric hook-ups and diversification. We help owners weigh how a project would change the trading picture and how it might be funded, whether as part of an acquisition, a refinance or a standalone improvement. We arrange and introduce only; we do not give financial, legal or tax advice, and any indication of terms is illustrative and not an offer of finance.

Buying a touring park as a commercial business

A buyer acquiring a touring park is buying a trading business, and the funding follows that logic. Most acquisitions are unregulated commercial lending, often through a limited company or special purpose vehicle, with the loan sized against the park's EBITDA and the security comprising the land and infrastructure. Lenders will expect the usual corporate support from directors and will scrutinise the trading accounts, the licence and the consent. For a first-time park owner, evidencing relevant experience or a credible management plan can make a meaningful difference to appetite and terms.

Because touring income is seasonal, the timing of a purchase and the first season under new ownership matter to a lender's confidence. A clean handover with bookings already in place reads very differently from a site bought mid-season with thin forward bookings. We help buyers prepare a file that anticipates these questions, presenting the trade, the documents and the plan in the way lenders assess them. Our role is to match the deal to the right lender and manage it to terms. This is general information, not advice, and any figures are indicative and not an offer of finance.

Worked example: acquiring a coastal touring park

Picture a coastal touring and camping park with around 120 pitches, a growing cluster of glamping pods and a busy main season, held freehold with a settled site licence and a consent permitting a long operating season. A buyer wants to acquire it through a limited company and add a few more pods over time.

A lender normalises EBITDA from three years of accounts, tests serviceability against a cautious season, and considers the glamping income as a resilience factor. With freehold tenure, a long season and evidenced repeat bookings, a facility around 55% to 60% loan to value over a 20-year term might be discussed, priced on the risk, with the pod expansion treated as a later, separately assessed project.

This is illustrative only, not an offer of finance, and not advice; actual terms depend on the lender, the park and full underwriting.

Illustrative worked example only. Figures vary by lender, asset and borrower and are not an offer of finance.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Does seasonality make a touring park hard to finance?

Not on its own. Seasonality is normal for touring parks, and many specialist lenders are comfortable with it provided peak-season trading is strong and the operating season long enough that normalised annual EBITDA services the debt with comfort, even in a weaker summer. What matters is evidence: several years of accounts showing the pattern of the business, a healthy share of repeat visitors and steady facility income. Some lenders price seasonality more cautiously than others, which is why matching the file to the right desk matters. We direct each case to lenders who treat seasonal income sympathetically. Any figures we provide are indicative and not an offer of finance.

Can adding glamping or pods help my funding case?

Often yes. Glamping pods, safari tents and lodge-style units let a park earn from guests without their own touring kit, command higher nightly rates and smooth income across a longer season, all of which improve the resilience a lender looks for. A credible record of glamping income, or a costed plan, can strengthen an application. It must be presented honestly, evidenced by actual bookings and margins where it exists or realistic projections where it is planned. Installing pods may itself need funding, which is a separate project conversation. We help frame both the trade and the project. This is general information, not advice, and figures are indicative and not an offer of finance.

How do AONB and coastal planning conditions affect lending?

Touring parks in coastal areas or in or near an Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty enjoy strong demand but often face tighter planning conditions on pitch numbers, layout, screening and season length. Those conditions cap how much the site can earn and for how long each year, which feeds directly into the income a lender can underwrite. A consent allowing a longer season or more pitches is generally worth more. We treat the planning position as a core part of the file so a lender can size the loan accurately and avoid late surprises. Changes such as extra pitches need their own planning route and proper advice. This is not legal or planning advice.

Can I buy a touring park through a limited company?

Yes. Touring park acquisitions are usually unregulated commercial lending, and buying through a limited company or special purpose vehicle is common. The loan is sized against the park's EBITDA, with the land and infrastructure as security and the usual director support expected. For a first-time park owner, evidencing relevant experience or a credible management plan can improve appetite and terms. The choice of structure carries tax and legal consequences outside our remit, so take proper professional advice. We arrange and introduce funding and manage the case to terms; we do not lend and we do not give financial, legal or tax advice. Any terms indicated are illustrative and not an offer of finance.

Funding a touring & camping parks asset?

Tell us about the deal and we will come back with a view on fundability and likely terms.